<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media Best Practice: Be Vigilant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onlinemarketerblog.com/2008/09/social-media-best-practice-be-vigilant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onlinemarketerblog.com/2008/09/social-media-best-practice-be-vigilant/</link>
	<description>If Copyblogger and JaffeJuice had a bad-ass baby</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:16:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: THINKing &#187; Social Media Best Practices</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketerblog.com/2008/09/social-media-best-practice-be-vigilant/comment-page-1/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator>THINKing &#187; Social Media Best Practices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketerblog.com/?p=412#comment-403</guid>
		<description>[...] OnlineMarketerBlog threw out the challenge for us to discuss our social media best practice. The blog&#8217;s author, DJ Francis, called me &#8220;impressively tenacious&#8221;. That&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OnlineMarketerBlog threw out the challenge for us to discuss our social media best practice. The blog&#8217;s author, DJ Francis, called me &#8220;impressively tenacious&#8221;. That&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikepk</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketerblog.com/2008/09/social-media-best-practice-be-vigilant/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>mikepk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketerblog.com/?p=412#comment-400</guid>
		<description>I think we (collectively) are on the verge of tools that help the process of social media, rather than the &#039;bits&#039; of it. 

Our new site (http://vibemetrix.com) is a first stab at this for blog conversation engagement but I think it also addresses some of the problems for the latter type of person you mention. Heck, I fall into that catgory as a CTO and &#039;reserved&#039; type. I find having a work flow, lists of posts I&#039;ve flagged as interesting, and then being able to flag those posts (and blogs) for following up makes it easier on me and more systematic. 

Making engaging in blogs systematic, accountable, and trackable has been a piece that&#039;s been missing from the social media equation (IMHO). I also think it solves a problem between personal and corporate social media engagement. It&#039;s easy to split people into these two camps, but companies I think lean more heavily towards being reserved (depending on the size). Without accountability and some sense of ROI, it&#039;s hard for bigger companies to understand and connect with the tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we (collectively) are on the verge of tools that help the process of social media, rather than the &#8216;bits&#8217; of it. </p>
<p>Our new site (<a href="http://vibemetrix.com" rel="nofollow">http://vibemetrix.com</a>) is a first stab at this for blog conversation engagement but I think it also addresses some of the problems for the latter type of person you mention. Heck, I fall into that catgory as a CTO and &#8216;reserved&#8217; type. I find having a work flow, lists of posts I&#8217;ve flagged as interesting, and then being able to flag those posts (and blogs) for following up makes it easier on me and more systematic. </p>
<p>Making engaging in blogs systematic, accountable, and trackable has been a piece that&#8217;s been missing from the social media equation (IMHO). I also think it solves a problem between personal and corporate social media engagement. It&#8217;s easy to split people into these two camps, but companies I think lean more heavily towards being reserved (depending on the size). Without accountability and some sense of ROI, it&#8217;s hard for bigger companies to understand and connect with the tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Klein</title>
		<link>http://onlinemarketerblog.com/2008/09/social-media-best-practice-be-vigilant/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onlinemarketerblog.com/?p=412#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Awesome post.

I stay vigilant by targeting people, rather than tools, for attention. By experimentation, networking, and just good natured friendliness, I like to build relationships with individuals and make sure I stay up to date with what they&#039;re doing across a wide variety of communication touch points.

It&#039;s sort of the &quot;narrow and deep&quot; versus &quot;broad and shallow&quot; approach. Neither way is the right way, but I find the former more satisfying!

It&#039;s easier to stay vigilant when I am passionate about talking with certain people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post.</p>
<p>I stay vigilant by targeting people, rather than tools, for attention. By experimentation, networking, and just good natured friendliness, I like to build relationships with individuals and make sure I stay up to date with what they&#8217;re doing across a wide variety of communication touch points.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sort of the &#8220;narrow and deep&#8221; versus &#8220;broad and shallow&#8221; approach. Neither way is the right way, but I find the former more satisfying!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easier to stay vigilant when I am passionate about talking with certain people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
